The Truth About Rosanne Boyland’s Death: Even J6 Defenders Admit It Was an Overdose
Tommy Tatum — a January 6 participant — continues to claim Rosanne Boyland was “murdered by police” and that the government hid “HD footage” proving it.
But here’s the reality no one in the media or fringe circles wants to admit:
โธป
1. The Official Ruling: Accidental Overdose
• The D.C. Medical Examiner determined Rosanne Boyland died of acute amphetamine intoxication (a fatal overdose) — not beating, not trampling, not murder.
• This conclusion has been reviewed in court documents, congressional records, and multiple independent investigations.
โธป
2. Fact-Checks Across the Spectrum
• FactCheck.org, Newsweek, Vanity Fair, and WaPo: All found no evidence of hidden HD footage or a murder coverโup.
• The supposed “grainy footage” claim ignores that multiple camera angles were reviewed publicly and in court — none support Tatum’s version.
โธป
3. Even Right-Leaning Voices Agree
This isn’t just a “mainstream narrative.”
Prominent J6-sympathetic commentators and conservative outlets have acknowledged the overdose ruling:
• Julie Kelly (American Greatness): Focuses on prison conditions but does not dispute the overdose finding.
• Rekieta Law (Nick Rekieta): Conservative streamer; reviewed evidence, concluded there’s “no murder evidence.”
• The Gateway Pundit: Initially amplified rumors, later shifted to covering Boyland’s tragedy and addiction rather than alleging murder.
• Look Ahead America: A leading J6 advocacy group; fights for detainees’ rights but doesn’t back murder claims.
Even among Boyland’s own supporters, Tatum’s theory is fringe.
โธป
4. Why the Truth Matters
False claims don’t just smear the truth — they weaken legitimate calls for accountability.
The chaos of January 6 was real. The pain of the families is real. But inventing murder conspiracies dishonors both.
โธป
5. Claims of “Expertise”
• Tatum brands himself as a January 6 “footage expert,” promoting his own reviews of Capitol videos online.
• But his central claim about Rosanne Boyland — that she was murdered by police — has been repeatedly disproven by:
• The D.C. Medical Examiner’s autopsy (overdose).
• Multiple video angles reviewed by Congress, media, and independent analysts.
• J6 defense attorneys who did not pursue murder arguments in court filings.
If he’s wrong about this, how reliable is any of his “analysis”?
โธป
6. Was He Even Beside Her?
• Tatum claims he was physically next to Boyland when she died.
• No verified evidence — such as contemporaneous photos, video, or official witness statements — confirms this.
• His claim relies solely on his own testimony, which is contradicted by:
• Crowd-sourced video mapping of the tunnel area (Boyland’s position vs. Tatum’s known movements).
• Lack of corroboration from other defendants or witnesses present.
• Multiple J6 defendant accounts and court exhibits place different individuals near Boyland during her collapse.
โธป
7. Why This Matters
• Tatum’s personal credibility hinges on this claim. If he lied or misrepresented being next to Boyland, his entire “expert” persona collapses.
• By pushing a disproven murder narrative, he undermines legitimate J6 grievances (e.g., overcharging, prison conditions) and makes it easier for critics to dismiss all J6 concerns as conspiracy.
Our Stand
This campaign fights for transparency and justice — based on facts, not internet rumors.
New York, and America, deserve leaders who tell the hard truth — even when it challenges their own side.
https://x.com/benkaxton/status/1948747786096115910?s=46
#JSA2026 #AmericanDream #NYGovernor #TruthMatters #TurnNYRed
Tommy Tatum — a January 6 participant — continues to claim Rosanne Boyland was “murdered by police” and that the government hid “HD footage” proving it.
But here’s the reality no one in the media or fringe circles wants to admit:
โธป
1. The Official Ruling: Accidental Overdose
• The D.C. Medical Examiner determined Rosanne Boyland died of acute amphetamine intoxication (a fatal overdose) — not beating, not trampling, not murder.
• This conclusion has been reviewed in court documents, congressional records, and multiple independent investigations.
โธป
2. Fact-Checks Across the Spectrum
• FactCheck.org, Newsweek, Vanity Fair, and WaPo: All found no evidence of hidden HD footage or a murder coverโup.
• The supposed “grainy footage” claim ignores that multiple camera angles were reviewed publicly and in court — none support Tatum’s version.
โธป
3. Even Right-Leaning Voices Agree
This isn’t just a “mainstream narrative.”
Prominent J6-sympathetic commentators and conservative outlets have acknowledged the overdose ruling:
• Julie Kelly (American Greatness): Focuses on prison conditions but does not dispute the overdose finding.
• Rekieta Law (Nick Rekieta): Conservative streamer; reviewed evidence, concluded there’s “no murder evidence.”
• The Gateway Pundit: Initially amplified rumors, later shifted to covering Boyland’s tragedy and addiction rather than alleging murder.
• Look Ahead America: A leading J6 advocacy group; fights for detainees’ rights but doesn’t back murder claims.
Even among Boyland’s own supporters, Tatum’s theory is fringe.
โธป
4. Why the Truth Matters
False claims don’t just smear the truth — they weaken legitimate calls for accountability.
The chaos of January 6 was real. The pain of the families is real. But inventing murder conspiracies dishonors both.
โธป
5. Claims of “Expertise”
• Tatum brands himself as a January 6 “footage expert,” promoting his own reviews of Capitol videos online.
• But his central claim about Rosanne Boyland — that she was murdered by police — has been repeatedly disproven by:
• The D.C. Medical Examiner’s autopsy (overdose).
• Multiple video angles reviewed by Congress, media, and independent analysts.
• J6 defense attorneys who did not pursue murder arguments in court filings.
If he’s wrong about this, how reliable is any of his “analysis”?
โธป
6. Was He Even Beside Her?
• Tatum claims he was physically next to Boyland when she died.
• No verified evidence — such as contemporaneous photos, video, or official witness statements — confirms this.
• His claim relies solely on his own testimony, which is contradicted by:
• Crowd-sourced video mapping of the tunnel area (Boyland’s position vs. Tatum’s known movements).
• Lack of corroboration from other defendants or witnesses present.
• Multiple J6 defendant accounts and court exhibits place different individuals near Boyland during her collapse.
โธป
7. Why This Matters
• Tatum’s personal credibility hinges on this claim. If he lied or misrepresented being next to Boyland, his entire “expert” persona collapses.
• By pushing a disproven murder narrative, he undermines legitimate J6 grievances (e.g., overcharging, prison conditions) and makes it easier for critics to dismiss all J6 concerns as conspiracy.
Our Stand
This campaign fights for transparency and justice — based on facts, not internet rumors.
New York, and America, deserve leaders who tell the hard truth — even when it challenges their own side.
https://x.com/benkaxton/status/1948747786096115910?s=46
#JSA2026 #AmericanDream #NYGovernor #TruthMatters #TurnNYRed
The Truth About Rosanne Boyland’s Death: Even J6 Defenders Admit It Was an Overdose
Tommy Tatum — a January 6 participant — continues to claim Rosanne Boyland was “murdered by police” and that the government hid “HD footage” proving it.
But here’s the reality no one in the media or fringe circles wants to admit:
โธป
1. The Official Ruling: Accidental Overdose
• The D.C. Medical Examiner determined Rosanne Boyland died of acute amphetamine intoxication (a fatal overdose) — not beating, not trampling, not murder.
• This conclusion has been reviewed in court documents, congressional records, and multiple independent investigations.
โธป
2. Fact-Checks Across the Spectrum
• FactCheck.org, Newsweek, Vanity Fair, and WaPo: All found no evidence of hidden HD footage or a murder coverโup.
• The supposed “grainy footage” claim ignores that multiple camera angles were reviewed publicly and in court — none support Tatum’s version.
โธป
3. Even Right-Leaning Voices Agree
This isn’t just a “mainstream narrative.”
Prominent J6-sympathetic commentators and conservative outlets have acknowledged the overdose ruling:
• Julie Kelly (American Greatness): Focuses on prison conditions but does not dispute the overdose finding.
• Rekieta Law (Nick Rekieta): Conservative streamer; reviewed evidence, concluded there’s “no murder evidence.”
• The Gateway Pundit: Initially amplified rumors, later shifted to covering Boyland’s tragedy and addiction rather than alleging murder.
• Look Ahead America: A leading J6 advocacy group; fights for detainees’ rights but doesn’t back murder claims.
Even among Boyland’s own supporters, Tatum’s theory is fringe.
โธป
4. Why the Truth Matters
False claims don’t just smear the truth — they weaken legitimate calls for accountability.
The chaos of January 6 was real. The pain of the families is real. But inventing murder conspiracies dishonors both.
โธป
5. Claims of “Expertise”
• Tatum brands himself as a January 6 “footage expert,” promoting his own reviews of Capitol videos online.
• But his central claim about Rosanne Boyland — that she was murdered by police — has been repeatedly disproven by:
• The D.C. Medical Examiner’s autopsy (overdose).
• Multiple video angles reviewed by Congress, media, and independent analysts.
• J6 defense attorneys who did not pursue murder arguments in court filings.
If he’s wrong about this, how reliable is any of his “analysis”?
โธป
6. Was He Even Beside Her?
• Tatum claims he was physically next to Boyland when she died.
• No verified evidence — such as contemporaneous photos, video, or official witness statements — confirms this.
• His claim relies solely on his own testimony, which is contradicted by:
• Crowd-sourced video mapping of the tunnel area (Boyland’s position vs. Tatum’s known movements).
• Lack of corroboration from other defendants or witnesses present.
• Multiple J6 defendant accounts and court exhibits place different individuals near Boyland during her collapse.
โธป
7. Why This Matters
• Tatum’s personal credibility hinges on this claim. If he lied or misrepresented being next to Boyland, his entire “expert” persona collapses.
• By pushing a disproven murder narrative, he undermines legitimate J6 grievances (e.g., overcharging, prison conditions) and makes it easier for critics to dismiss all J6 concerns as conspiracy.
Our Stand
This campaign fights for transparency and justice — based on facts, not internet rumors.
New York, and America, deserve leaders who tell the hard truth — even when it challenges their own side.
https://x.com/benkaxton/status/1948747786096115910?s=46
#JSA2026 #AmericanDream #NYGovernor #TruthMatters #TurnNYRed
0 Comments
0 Shares
269 Views
0 Reviews