Recent Updates
-
How to Write In a Candidate — And Why It Matters Now
New York elections are supposed to be about choice.
Too often, they aren’t.
Every cycle, millions of New Yorkers stay home—not because they don’t care, but because the ballot doesn’t reflect them. The same party-approved names. The same donors. The same outcomes.
That’s where a write-in vote matters.
How to Write In a Name (It’s Simple)
1. Go to your ballot on Election Day
2. Find the “Write-In” line for Governor
3. Clearly write: Jason S. Arnold
4. Fill in the oval or box next to the write-in line
That’s it. Your vote counts the same as any other.
Why This Movement Matters Right Now
We’re living through a moment where:
• Trust in government is at historic lows
• Voters feel trapped between two parties that answer to donors first
• Real issues—affordability, safety, energy, housing, childcare—are talked about endlessly but fixed rarely
• Accountability disappears once elections are over
A write-in campaign isn’t about symbolism.
It’s about restoring leverage to voters.
It says:
• We don’t accept pre-approved choices
• We don’t need permission to participate
• We expect transparency, execution, and accountability
New York has a long history of protest elections—moments when voters reminded the system who it works for. The Great Write-In of 2026 is about doing that again, peacefully, legally, and clearly.
No corporate money.
No party gatekeepers.
Just people using the power they already have.
If you’ve ever said “there has to be a better option”—this is how you make that real.
Write it in.
Make it count.
Learn more at JSA2026.com
#WriteInJason #TheGreatWriteIn #NYGov2026 #TakeBackNewYorkHow to Write In a Candidate — And Why It Matters Now New York elections are supposed to be about choice. Too often, they aren’t. Every cycle, millions of New Yorkers stay home—not because they don’t care, but because the ballot doesn’t reflect them. The same party-approved names. The same donors. The same outcomes. That’s where a write-in vote matters. 🗳️ How to Write In a Name (It’s Simple) 1. Go to your ballot on Election Day 2. Find the “Write-In” line for Governor 3. Clearly write: Jason S. Arnold 4. Fill in the oval or box next to the write-in line That’s it. Your vote counts the same as any other. Why This Movement Matters Right Now We’re living through a moment where: • Trust in government is at historic lows • Voters feel trapped between two parties that answer to donors first • Real issues—affordability, safety, energy, housing, childcare—are talked about endlessly but fixed rarely • Accountability disappears once elections are over A write-in campaign isn’t about symbolism. It’s about restoring leverage to voters. It says: • We don’t accept pre-approved choices • We don’t need permission to participate • We expect transparency, execution, and accountability New York has a long history of protest elections—moments when voters reminded the system who it works for. The Great Write-In of 2026 is about doing that again, peacefully, legally, and clearly. No corporate money. No party gatekeepers. Just people using the power they already have. If you’ve ever said “there has to be a better option”—this is how you make that real. Write it in. Make it count. 👉 Learn more at JSA2026.com #WriteInJason #TheGreatWriteIn #NYGov2026 #TakeBackNewYork
0 Comments 0 Shares 10 Views 0 Reviews -
We’re back up and running.
The JSA2026 site is now live on an upgraded server with a brand-new, fluid, easy-to-read homepage built for real New Yorkers—not political insiders.
No clutter.
No spin.
Just clear ideas, real plans, and full transparency.
Check it out today: https://jsa2026.com
New York deserves a real choice in 2026.
This is how we start.
— Jason S. Arnold
Candidate for Governor of New York
#JSA2026 #TheGreatWriteIn #NYGov2026 #NewYorkPolitics🚀 We’re back up and running. The JSA2026 site is now live on an upgraded server with a brand-new, fluid, easy-to-read homepage built for real New Yorkers—not political insiders. No clutter. No spin. Just clear ideas, real plans, and full transparency. 👉 Check it out today: https://jsa2026.com New York deserves a real choice in 2026. This is how we start. — Jason S. Arnold Candidate for Governor of New York #JSA2026 #TheGreatWriteIn #NYGov2026 #NewYorkPolitics0 Comments 0 Shares 14 Views 0 Reviews -
Why write-in?
Because New York understands protest elections — the kind that tell political gatekeepers we’re done asking permission.
I voted for Trump twice and supported him when I believed it was right — but character, transparency, and accountability still matter. New York deserves better than recycled insiders and fake choices.
No corporate money. No lobbyists. Just people power.
My full, detailed blueprint is live at jsa2026.com:
• End property-tax slavery (homestead protections + voter-consent caps)
• Max penalties for crimes against women and children (no plea deals, lifetime monitoring)
• Nuclear NY — clean, cheap power + union jobs
• Fix the MTA, affordable daycare through SUNY/CUNY, fair maps to end gerrymandering
• Women’s equity, real mental-health reform, and liberty protections (gold/silver tender, no CBDCs)
Execution paths included. Hold me accountable.
This is about taking New York back — safer streets, lower taxes, and dignity for everyone.
Upstate. Downstate. Suburbs.
If half the state chips in $5, we fund this fight without selling out.
Small donors = real change.
#WriteInJason #NYGov2026 #TheGreatWriteIn
Why write-in? Because New York understands protest elections — the kind that tell political gatekeepers we’re done asking permission. I voted for Trump twice and supported him when I believed it was right — but character, transparency, and accountability still matter. New York deserves better than recycled insiders and fake choices. No corporate money. No lobbyists. Just people power. My full, detailed blueprint is live at jsa2026.com: • End property-tax slavery (homestead protections + voter-consent caps) • Max penalties for crimes against women and children (no plea deals, lifetime monitoring) • Nuclear NY — clean, cheap power + union jobs • Fix the MTA, affordable daycare through SUNY/CUNY, fair maps to end gerrymandering • Women’s equity, real mental-health reform, and liberty protections (gold/silver tender, no CBDCs) Execution paths included. Hold me accountable. This is about taking New York back — safer streets, lower taxes, and dignity for everyone. Upstate. Downstate. Suburbs. If half the state chips in $5, we fund this fight without selling out. Small donors = real change. #WriteInJason #NYGov2026 #TheGreatWriteIn
0 Comments 0 Shares 43 Views 0 Reviews -
BOOK II — THE COMING
Chapter III — Of the Few and the Many
(The Veil Version — VV)
1. The many spoke often of unity,
yet gathered only in likeness,
and so remained divided.
2. They stood beside one another,
but not with one another,
mistaking proximity for agreement
and noise for strength.
3. Each group named a different cause,
yet all felt the same weight,
though none agreed where it rested.
4. For the burden was not shared equally,
nor was the benefit;
it moved upward quietly,
while the many argued below.
5. They were told division was natural,
even healthy,
and so they guarded their differences
more fiercely than their common loss.
6. The few required no unity,
only distraction;
no consensus,
only delay.
7. And while the many debated one another,
measures were set,
paths narrowed,
and decisions finalized
without their presence.
8. It was then understood—
not taught—
that the many were never meant
to agree on everything,
only on what mattered.
9. For unity was not sameness,
but alignment;
not uniform voice,
but shared direction.
10. Yet alignment demanded recognition,
and recognition threatened comfort.
11. Thus the many remained many,
and the few remained few,
not by force,
but by hesitation.
12. So it was written:
the many would not become one
until they discerned
what stood apart from them all.
BOOK II — THE COMING Chapter III — Of the Few and the Many (The Veil Version — VV) 1. The many spoke often of unity, yet gathered only in likeness, and so remained divided. 2. They stood beside one another, but not with one another, mistaking proximity for agreement and noise for strength. 3. Each group named a different cause, yet all felt the same weight, though none agreed where it rested. 4. For the burden was not shared equally, nor was the benefit; it moved upward quietly, while the many argued below. 5. They were told division was natural, even healthy, and so they guarded their differences more fiercely than their common loss. 6. The few required no unity, only distraction; no consensus, only delay. 7. And while the many debated one another, measures were set, paths narrowed, and decisions finalized without their presence. 8. It was then understood— not taught— that the many were never meant to agree on everything, only on what mattered. 9. For unity was not sameness, but alignment; not uniform voice, but shared direction. 10. Yet alignment demanded recognition, and recognition threatened comfort. 11. Thus the many remained many, and the few remained few, not by force, but by hesitation. 12. So it was written: the many would not become one until they discerned what stood apart from them all.0 Comments 0 Shares 201 Views 0 Reviews -
BOOK II — THE COMING
Chapter II — Of the Settled Matter
1. The matter did not resolve itself.
It was absorbed.
2. The questions multiplied quietly,
asked in private,
denied in public.
3. Many sensed the imbalance,
though no name was agreed upon
and no cause admitted.
4. Restlessness spread without direction.
Certainty weakened without opposition.
5. The search for reassurance grew,
yet comfort did not answer.
6. What was once dismissed as anxiety
became shared experience,
though no gathering was called.
7. Authority spoke often,
but conviction did not return.
8. Silence remained widespread,
not from ignorance,
but from recognition.
9. Preparation began without instruction.
Fear without object took root.
10. The ground shifted beneath familiar language,
and the old assurances lost weight.
11. No announcement followed.
None was needed.
12. So it was written:
the matter was settled
before it was acknowledged,
and the turning preceded the understanding.
BOOK II — THE COMING Chapter II — Of the Settled Matter 1. The matter did not resolve itself. It was absorbed. 2. The questions multiplied quietly, asked in private, denied in public. 3. Many sensed the imbalance, though no name was agreed upon and no cause admitted. 4. Restlessness spread without direction. Certainty weakened without opposition. 5. The search for reassurance grew, yet comfort did not answer. 6. What was once dismissed as anxiety became shared experience, though no gathering was called. 7. Authority spoke often, but conviction did not return. 8. Silence remained widespread, not from ignorance, but from recognition. 9. Preparation began without instruction. Fear without object took root. 10. The ground shifted beneath familiar language, and the old assurances lost weight. 11. No announcement followed. None was needed. 12. So it was written: the matter was settled before it was acknowledged, and the turning preceded the understanding.0 Comments 0 Shares 605 Views 0 Reviews -
Statement on New York Redistricting and Gerrymandering
The recent court ruling declaring New York’s 11th Congressional District unconstitutional highlights a problem that goes far beyond any single district or political party: gerrymandering undermines trust in our elections.
District lines should never be drawn to protect politicians or predetermine outcomes. They should reflect real communities, respect geographic continuity, and give voters a fair chance to choose their representatives—not the other way around.
While this ruling is an important corrective step, it should also serve as a reminder that “independent” processes are only meaningful if they are transparent, accountable, and insulated from partisan pressure. Fair maps are not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue—they are a democracy issue.
New Yorkers deserve congressional districts that are constitutional, competitive, and honest. Anything less weakens confidence in government and fuels the belief that elections are rigged before the first vote is cast.
Real reform means drawing maps that serve voters, not powerStatement on New York Redistricting and Gerrymandering The recent court ruling declaring New York’s 11th Congressional District unconstitutional highlights a problem that goes far beyond any single district or political party: gerrymandering undermines trust in our elections. District lines should never be drawn to protect politicians or predetermine outcomes. They should reflect real communities, respect geographic continuity, and give voters a fair chance to choose their representatives—not the other way around. While this ruling is an important corrective step, it should also serve as a reminder that “independent” processes are only meaningful if they are transparent, accountable, and insulated from partisan pressure. Fair maps are not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue—they are a democracy issue. New Yorkers deserve congressional districts that are constitutional, competitive, and honest. Anything less weakens confidence in government and fuels the belief that elections are rigged before the first vote is cast. Real reform means drawing maps that serve voters, not power0 Comments 0 Shares 677 Views 0 Reviews
More Stories
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek