To Everyone Who Believes in What Zohran Stands For — New York Needs a Governor Who Fights the Same Fight

To everyone who stood with Zohran Mamdani — organizers, tenants, students, working families, transit riders, small businesses, and every New Yorker who refuses to accept a government that forgets who it serves:

Let me speak to you directly.

If your vote was about changing the system, not maintaining it…
If it was about power in the hands of real people, not donors…
If it was about housing, affordability, justice, and dignity…
— then you deserve a governor who carries that fight statewide.

Hochul won’t do that.

Her administration defends the same old Albany machinery that has made life harder for the people you fight for.
Rents are up.
Transit is broken.
Budgets are bloated.
Neighborhoods are ignored.
And when working people demand change, she gives them task forces and press conferences.

Elise won’t do that either.

She talks like an outsider but operates like a D.C. insider.
She has the same donor networks, the same political handlers, the same establishment backing the system uses to choke off new voices before they reach voters.

Hochul protects the Albany machine.
Elise protects the Washington machine.
Neither protects the people who make New York run.

But a governor should — and I will.

I’m not part of their circles.
I’m not owned by donors, consultants, or party elites.
My loyalties are to the people who pay the price when Albany fails:
working families, commuters, parents, renters, small-business owners, and every New Yorker crushed by the cost of simply existing here.

That’s why I’ve put every plan on the table now — not after the election.
Real policy, real math, real transparency, and a clear path to making life in New York possible again.

If you supported Zohran because you want a government that works for EVERYONE — not the few — then I’m asking you to take a look at where I stand and why the establishment is trying to decide this race before you get a voice in it.

Start here:
Visit the homepage on JSA2026.com

This isn’t a red-vs-blue fight.
This is a people-vs-machine fight.
And if you believe in the movement Zohran built…
If you believe in neighborhoods over donors…
If you believe in a New York where dignity is not optional —
then you deserve a governor who fights that same fight.

I intend to be that governor.

— Jason S. Arnold

JSA2026 Puts Elise Stefanik Contrast Front and Center for 2026 NY Governor Race

We’ve updated our campaign site to spotlight a comprehensive, fact-based breakdown of why Elise Stefanik cannot win statewide in New York—and why our affordability-first, math-driven JSA2026 campaign can. The homepage now features a prominent alert card linking directly to the full “Why Elise Can’t Win NY in 2026 — And Why I Can” analysis, alongside our full vision, Day-One Orders, and core policy platform.

#JSA2026 #NYSGovernor #NYPolitics #EliseStefanik #Affordability #Independents #SuburbanVoters #BETTRNewswire

https://jsa2026.com/why-elise-stefanik-cant-win-new-york-in-2026-and-why-i-can/

Updated: November 13, 2025
Jason S. Arnold for Governor of New York (2026)

New York State Gubernatorial — Mock Poll (Illustrative)

Field dates (mock): Aug 10–13, 2025
Sample: 1,000 registered voters (RV), mixed phone/SMS-to-web
Weighting: Region, gender, age, party ID, race/ethnicity, education, 2022 vote recall
MOE: ±3.1% (RV)
Turnout model: 2022 general baseline with modest GOP improvement in suburbs

Topline — 3‑Way Ballot (RV)
• Kathy Hochul (D) — 46%
• Elise Stefanik (R) — 32%
• Jason S. Arnold (I/Other) — 9%
• Someone else — 3%
• Undecided — 10%

Read: Mirrors typical D advantage statewide, Stefanik trails by low‑ to mid‑teens; Arnold shows early viability as the only candidate running a fully transparent plan.

Head‑to‑Head Scenarios (RV)

Hochul vs. Stefanik
• Hochul 48%
• Stefanik 35%
• Undecided 17%

Hochul vs. Jason S. Arnold
• Hochul 44%
• Arnold 38%
• Undecided 18%

Read: Arnold consolidates more independents and soft Democrats than Stefanik can, cutting the margin to single digits.

Region (3‑Way Ballot)
• NYC (approx. 31% of sample): Hochul 67 | Stefanik 15 | Arnold 6 | Und 9
• Downstate Suburbs (LI/Westchester/Rockland, 28%): Hochul 44 | Stefanik 36 | Arnold 11 | Und 7
• Upstate (41%): Stefanik 44 | Hochul 33 | Arnold 11 | Und 9

Read: Arnold’s 10–11% in suburbs & upstate is a credible early lane; growth path is independents + moderate Republicans + anti‑status‑quo Dems.

Party & Independents (3‑Way Ballot)
• Democrats: Hochul 77 | Arnold 8 | Stefanik 7 | Und 6
• Republicans: Stefanik 70 | Arnold 13 | Hochul 10 | Und 6
• Independents: Arnold 28 | Hochul 34 | Stefanik 24 | Und 12

Read: Arnold leads or competes for plurality among independents, the key to statewide viability.

Favorability (Fav/Unfav/Don’t know)
• Hochul: 45 / 49 / 6
• Stefanik: 33 / 52 / 15
• Jason S. Arnold: 24 / 16 / 60

Read: Arnold’s low negatives + high unknowns = big upside with name‑ID growth.

Top Issues (open-coded → grouped)
• Cost of living/inflation: 34%
• Crime/public safety: 18%
• Housing/affordability: 15%
• Taxes: 12%
• Migration/services capacity: 9%
• Transit/infrastructure: 6%
• Other: 6%

Issue Ownership (net trust)
• Cost of living: Arnold +3 vs Hochul, Arnold +9 vs Stefanik
• Crime: Arnold +5 vs Hochul, Stefanik +2 vs Hochul
• Housing: Arnold +4 vs Hochul, Arnold +7 vs Stefanik

Read: The “full‑plan transparency” message gives Arnold an issues credibility edge—especially on daily-life economics & housing.

Message Tests (net more likely – less likely)
• “Full transparency: every policy & Day‑One orders published now.” +23
• “Coney Island 2.0: tourism/jobs engine (Vegas+AC without the rot).” +14 (Downstate suburbs +19)
• “Whistleblower/transparency on waste, fraud, and no‑show work.” +18
• “Education SEZ/LEZ: local control, measurable outcomes.” +12
• “Mental Health First Act & first‑responder supports.” +11

⸻

Crosstab Highlights (selected)
• Women (RV): Hochul +17 vs Stefanik; Hochul +6 vs Arnold
• Men (RV): Hochul +4 vs Stefanik; Arnold +2 vs Hochul (independents drive this)
• Hispanic voters: Hochul +25 vs Stefanik; Hochul +11 vs Arnold (Arnold competitive on cost-of-living frame)
• Black voters: Hochul dominant; Arnold overperforms Stefanik on favorables by ~6 pts (low name ID = room to grow)
• White non‑college: Stefanik leads Hochul by 6; Arnold within 4 of Stefanik with “work, wages, housing” message
• Voters rating economy “poor”: Arnold 31 | Hochul 30 | Stefanik 28 (3‑way) — transparency + concrete fixes resonate

⸻

Questionnaire (12 items, neutral wording)
1. Reg voter screen (self‑reported)
2. Party ID & 2022 vote recall
3. Fav/Unfav: Hochul, Stefanik, Jason S. Arnold
4. Most important issue (open)
5. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Stefanik
6. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Jason S. Arnold
7. 3‑way ballot: Hochul / Stefanik / Jason S. Arnold / someone else / undecided
8. Confidence in each candidate to improve cost of living (0–10 scale)
9. Confidence to improve public safety (0–10)
10. Message test A (full transparency/Day‑One orders) — more/less likely/ no diff
11. Message test B (Coney Island 2.0 jobs/tourism plan) — more/less likely/ no diff
12. Demographics: age, gender, education, region, race/ethnicity, HH income

BETTR Campaign Post | April 21, 2025

Title: From Naïveté to Realization: The Intentionality Behind Progressive Policies

There was a time when I believed that many Democratic policies, though misguided, were the result of ignorance or a lack of foresight. I thought perhaps they were simply turning a blind eye to the unintended consequences of their decisions. However, as we observe the current political landscape, it's becoming increasingly evident that these policies are not just ill-conceived—they are intentionally designed, with outcomes that are both alarming and detrimental to our society.

The Tragedy of Rachel Morin: A Case Ignored

Consider the heartbreaking case of Rachel Morin, a mother of five from Maryland. In 2023, Rachel was brutally raped and murdered by an illegal immigrant from El Salvador, a known MS-13 gang member. Despite the gravity of this crime, the mainstream media provided minimal coverage. Even more concerning, Senator Chris Van Hollen traveled to El Salvador to meet with the deported individual, while Rachel's grieving family received little acknowledgment from their elected officials.
meanwhile they prop up and fight to bring a MS13 gang member that courts and his wife deed extremely violent.

Mocking Disability: A New Low in Political Discourse

In another disturbing incident, Rep. Jasmine Crockett referred to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who uses a wheelchair, as "Governor Hot Wheels" during a public event. While she later claimed the comment targeted his policies, the remark was widely perceived as mocking his disability. Such rhetoric not only disrespects individuals with disabilities but also degrades the quality of our political discourse.

Targeting Innovation: The Assault on Tesla

Tesla, once hailed as a pioneer in electric vehicle innovation, has become a target for vandalism and arson. In recent months, multiple Tesla dealerships across the country have been attacked, with vehicles set ablaze and properties defaced with hateful symbols. These acts coincide with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's collaboration with the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, suggesting a politically motivated backlash against progress and innovation. Meanwhile not one democrat calls for a stop to this illegal action.

A Pattern of Prioritizing Criminals Over Victims

These incidents are not isolated. They reflect a broader pattern where certain political figures and institutions appear to prioritize the rights of criminals over the safety and dignity of law-abiding citizens. Whether it's the leniency shown towards violent offenders or the silence surrounding victims of heinous crimes, the message is clear: the current trajectory of progressive policies is not only misguided but dangerously intentional.

The Decline in Quality of Life in Democrat-Run Territories

In recent years, several Democrat-led cities have experienced significant challenges affecting residents' quality of life:​

Homelessness: As of January 2024, the United States saw a record high of 771,480 individuals experiencing homelessness, with urban areas in Democrat-led states like California contributing significantly to this surge. ​
Houston Chronicle

Crime Rates: Between 2020 and 2024, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experienced a 20% increase in homicides, highlighting concerns over escalating crime rates in certain Democrat-led cities.
Axios
​

Housing Affordability: Democrat-run cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York are among the least affordable for homebuyers, exacerbating economic disparities and housing crises.
Fox Business
​

A Call to Action

As a Republican and a concerned citizen, I urge all Americans to recognize these patterns and demand accountability. We must advocate for policies that prioritize public safety, respect for all individuals, and the rule of law. It's time to move beyond partisan politics and focus on the well-being of our communities.

#BETTR #TurnNYRed #JusticeForRachel #RespectAll #ProtectInnovation

April 21, 2025
https://jsa2026.com