• War isn’t free.
    It costs lives.
    It costs money.
    And right now, America is spending billions while millions of Americans struggle just to stay healthy.

    If we can afford endless foreign wars but can’t afford basic health care at home…
    we don’t have an Iran problem —
    we have a values problem.

    Change starts not in headlines…
    but in votes.

    Write the name. Change the game.
    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    War isn’t free. It costs lives. It costs money. And right now, America is spending billions while millions of Americans struggle just to stay healthy. If we can afford endless foreign wars but can’t afford basic health care at home… we don’t have an Iran problem — we have a values problem. Change starts not in headlines… but in votes. Write the name. Change the game. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 2كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • INDEPENDENT ISN’T A PARTY.
    IT’S A MINDSET.

    It means thinking for yourself.
    Voting for what makes sense.
    Refusing to be boxed in by labels, pressure, or party lines.

    Independent doesn’t mean standing alone.
    It means standing with people — not machines.

    New Yorkers aren’t looking for another party fight.
    They’re looking for leadership that answers to voters, not insiders.

    This election isn’t about left or right.
    It’s about whether the people are still allowed to choose.

    If you believe the state should belong to its citizens…
    you already understand the mindset.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    INDEPENDENT ISN’T A PARTY. IT’S A MINDSET. It means thinking for yourself. Voting for what makes sense. Refusing to be boxed in by labels, pressure, or party lines. Independent doesn’t mean standing alone. It means standing with people — not machines. New Yorkers aren’t looking for another party fight. They’re looking for leadership that answers to voters, not insiders. This election isn’t about left or right. It’s about whether the people are still allowed to choose. If you believe the state should belong to its citizens… you already understand the mindset. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 1كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • WHEN THE SHIP IS SINKING,
    YOU HAVE TO LET GO OF THE HANDRAILS.

    Holding tighter doesn’t save it.
    Pretending it’s fine doesn’t fix it.
    Waiting for someone else to act doesn’t change the outcome.

    At some point, people have to stop clinging to what isn’t working…
    and start moving toward what might.

    That’s what this election is about.

    Not fighting each other.
    Not defending parties.
    Not repeating the same cycle.

    It’s about voters deciding it’s time to let go —
    and use the power that’s been there all along.

    The write-in line isn’t risky.
    It’s the lifeboat.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    WHEN THE SHIP IS SINKING, YOU HAVE TO LET GO OF THE HANDRAILS. Holding tighter doesn’t save it. Pretending it’s fine doesn’t fix it. Waiting for someone else to act doesn’t change the outcome. At some point, people have to stop clinging to what isn’t working… and start moving toward what might. That’s what this election is about. Not fighting each other. Not defending parties. Not repeating the same cycle. It’s about voters deciding it’s time to let go — and use the power that’s been there all along. The write-in line isn’t risky. It’s the lifeboat. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 1كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • NEVER AGAIN IS NOW.

    For too long, New Yorkers have said
    “next election things will change.”
    “next time we’ll fix it.”
    “next time we’ll vote differently.”

    But change doesn’t happen next time.
    It happens the moment people decide enough is enough.

    This election is that moment.

    Not through anger.
    Not through division.
    Through voters standing together and using the power already in their hands.

    The write-in line isn’t symbolic.
    It’s the people’s reset button.

    Never again do we settle.
    Never again do we accept only the choices we’re given.
    Never again do we wait for someone else to act.

    This time, we act.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    NEVER AGAIN IS NOW. For too long, New Yorkers have said “next election things will change.” “next time we’ll fix it.” “next time we’ll vote differently.” But change doesn’t happen next time. It happens the moment people decide enough is enough. This election is that moment. Not through anger. Not through division. Through voters standing together and using the power already in their hands. The write-in line isn’t symbolic. It’s the people’s reset button. Never again do we settle. Never again do we accept only the choices we’re given. Never again do we wait for someone else to act. This time, we act. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 969 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • YOUR PEN IS STRONGER THAN THEIR PARTY.

    They have the machines.
    They have the money.
    They have the insiders.

    You have something more powerful — your vote.

    Every election, New Yorkers are told to pick from the same approved choices.
    But the ballot has a line they don’t control.

    The write-in line.

    That’s where the people still decide.

    This year, you don’t have to fight anyone.
    You just have to show up… and use your pen.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    YOUR PEN IS STRONGER THAN THEIR PARTY. They have the machines. They have the money. They have the insiders. You have something more powerful — your vote. Every election, New Yorkers are told to pick from the same approved choices. But the ballot has a line they don’t control. The write-in line. That’s where the people still decide. This year, you don’t have to fight anyone. You just have to show up… and use your pen. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 951 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • DON’T FIGHT. UNITE.
    WRITE THE NAME. CHANGE THE GAME.

    New Yorkers don’t need another shouting match.
    We don’t need more division.
    We don’t need parties telling us what our only choices are.

    We just need voters willing to stand together.

    Because this election isn’t decided by insiders…
    It’s decided by whoever shows up and uses the write-in line.

    One name.
    One movement.
    One moment to remind New York that power still belongs to the people.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    DON’T FIGHT. UNITE. WRITE THE NAME. CHANGE THE GAME. New Yorkers don’t need another shouting match. We don’t need more division. We don’t need parties telling us what our only choices are. We just need voters willing to stand together. Because this election isn’t decided by insiders… It’s decided by whoever shows up and uses the write-in line. One name. One movement. One moment to remind New York that power still belongs to the people. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 909 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • WRITE THE NAME. CHANGE THE GAME.

    That’s not a slogan.
    That’s the strategy.

    For years, New Yorkers have been told the only choices are the ones printed on the ballot.
    But the truth is — the system already gives us another option.

    The write-in line isn’t decoration.
    It’s power.

    🗳 When you write in a name, you bypass the party machine.
    🗳 You bypass insider deals.
    🗳 You bypass the idea that voters are stuck choosing the “less bad” option.

    You remind the state that the people still decide.

    This movement isn’t about fighting the system.
    It’s about using it.

    This election, New York has a choice:
    Accept what we’re handed…
    or write the name and change the game.

    Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    WRITE THE NAME. CHANGE THE GAME. That’s not a slogan. That’s the strategy. For years, New Yorkers have been told the only choices are the ones printed on the ballot. But the truth is — the system already gives us another option. The write-in line isn’t decoration. It’s power. 🗳 When you write in a name, you bypass the party machine. 🗳 You bypass insider deals. 🗳 You bypass the idea that voters are stuck choosing the “less bad” option. You remind the state that the people still decide. This movement isn’t about fighting the system. It’s about using it. This election, New York has a choice: Accept what we’re handed… or write the name and change the game. Write in: Jason S. Arnold New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 942 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • NEW YORK — THIS ELECTION, YOU DON’T HAVE TO FIGHT… WE CAN UNITE.

    The Great Write-In isn’t about parties.
    It’s about people remembering they still have the power.

    If the system won’t give us the candidate we believe in, the Constitution gives us another option — we write the name in ourselves.

    🗳 WHAT THE GREAT WRITE-IN IS:
    A peaceful, legal way for voters across New York to unite behind one candidate without needing party permission, insider backing, or political gatekeepers.

    🖊 HOW TO DO IT:
    1.Go to vote like normal on Election Day
    2.Find the write-in line on the ballot
    3.Fill in the oval/box
    4.Write in: Jason S. Arnold
    5.Submit your ballot — that’s it

    No protests.
    No chaos.
    No division.

    Just voters using the system the way it was meant to work.

    This isn’t about left vs right.
    It’s about New Yorkers standing together and proving the people still decide the future of this state.

    If enough of us act together, we don’t need to fight.
    We can unite — and win.

    New York gubernatorial race, 2026.

    I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.

    #SpreadTheWord
    #ShareThisNY
    #GrassrootsMovement
    #TakeBackOurVote
    #ThisIsOurElection
    NEW YORK — THIS ELECTION, YOU DON’T HAVE TO FIGHT… WE CAN UNITE. The Great Write-In isn’t about parties. It’s about people remembering they still have the power. If the system won’t give us the candidate we believe in, the Constitution gives us another option — we write the name in ourselves. 🗳 WHAT THE GREAT WRITE-IN IS: A peaceful, legal way for voters across New York to unite behind one candidate without needing party permission, insider backing, or political gatekeepers. 🖊 HOW TO DO IT: 1.Go to vote like normal on Election Day 2.Find the write-in line on the ballot 3.Fill in the oval/box 4.Write in: Jason S. Arnold 5.Submit your ballot — that’s it No protests. No chaos. No division. Just voters using the system the way it was meant to work. This isn’t about left vs right. It’s about New Yorkers standing together and proving the people still decide the future of this state. If enough of us act together, we don’t need to fight. We can unite — and win. New York gubernatorial race, 2026. I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one. #SpreadTheWord #ShareThisNY #GrassrootsMovement #TakeBackOurVote #ThisIsOurElection
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 993 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • New York State Gubernatorial — Mock Poll (Illustrative)

    Field dates (mock): Aug 10–13, 2025
    Sample: 1,000 registered voters (RV), mixed phone/SMS-to-web
    Weighting: Region, gender, age, party ID, race/ethnicity, education, 2022 vote recall
    MOE: ±3.1% (RV)
    Turnout model: 2022 general baseline with modest GOP improvement in suburbs

    Topline — 3‑Way Ballot (RV)
    • Kathy Hochul (D) — 46%
    • Elise Stefanik (R) — 32%
    • Jason S. Arnold (I/Other) — 9%
    • Someone else — 3%
    • Undecided — 10%

    Read: Mirrors typical D advantage statewide, Stefanik trails by low‑ to mid‑teens; Arnold shows early viability as the only candidate running a fully transparent plan.

    Head‑to‑Head Scenarios (RV)

    Hochul vs. Stefanik
    • Hochul 48%
    • Stefanik 35%
    • Undecided 17%

    Hochul vs. Jason S. Arnold
    • Hochul 44%
    • Arnold 38%
    • Undecided 18%

    Read: Arnold consolidates more independents and soft Democrats than Stefanik can, cutting the margin to single digits.

    Region (3‑Way Ballot)
    • NYC (approx. 31% of sample): Hochul 67 | Stefanik 15 | Arnold 6 | Und 9
    • Downstate Suburbs (LI/Westchester/Rockland, 28%): Hochul 44 | Stefanik 36 | Arnold 11 | Und 7
    • Upstate (41%): Stefanik 44 | Hochul 33 | Arnold 11 | Und 9

    Read: Arnold’s 10–11% in suburbs & upstate is a credible early lane; growth path is independents + moderate Republicans + anti‑status‑quo Dems.

    Party & Independents (3‑Way Ballot)
    • Democrats: Hochul 77 | Arnold 8 | Stefanik 7 | Und 6
    • Republicans: Stefanik 70 | Arnold 13 | Hochul 10 | Und 6
    • Independents: Arnold 28 | Hochul 34 | Stefanik 24 | Und 12

    Read: Arnold leads or competes for plurality among independents, the key to statewide viability.

    Favorability (Fav/Unfav/Don’t know)
    • Hochul: 45 / 49 / 6
    • Stefanik: 33 / 52 / 15
    • Jason S. Arnold: 24 / 16 / 60

    Read: Arnold’s low negatives + high unknowns = big upside with name‑ID growth.

    Top Issues (open-coded → grouped)
    • Cost of living/inflation: 34%
    • Crime/public safety: 18%
    • Housing/affordability: 15%
    • Taxes: 12%
    • Migration/services capacity: 9%
    • Transit/infrastructure: 6%
    • Other: 6%

    Issue Ownership (net trust)
    • Cost of living: Arnold +3 vs Hochul, Arnold +9 vs Stefanik
    • Crime: Arnold +5 vs Hochul, Stefanik +2 vs Hochul
    • Housing: Arnold +4 vs Hochul, Arnold +7 vs Stefanik

    Read: The “full‑plan transparency” message gives Arnold an issues credibility edge—especially on daily-life economics & housing.

    Message Tests (net more likely – less likely)
    • “Full transparency: every policy & Day‑One orders published now.” +23
    • “Coney Island 2.0: tourism/jobs engine (Vegas+AC without the rot).” +14 (Downstate suburbs +19)
    • “Whistleblower/transparency on waste, fraud, and no‑show work.” +18
    • “Education SEZ/LEZ: local control, measurable outcomes.” +12
    • “Mental Health First Act & first‑responder supports.” +11



    Crosstab Highlights (selected)
    • Women (RV): Hochul +17 vs Stefanik; Hochul +6 vs Arnold
    • Men (RV): Hochul +4 vs Stefanik; Arnold +2 vs Hochul (independents drive this)
    • Hispanic voters: Hochul +25 vs Stefanik; Hochul +11 vs Arnold (Arnold competitive on cost-of-living frame)
    • Black voters: Hochul dominant; Arnold overperforms Stefanik on favorables by ~6 pts (low name ID = room to grow)
    • White non‑college: Stefanik leads Hochul by 6; Arnold within 4 of Stefanik with “work, wages, housing” message
    • Voters rating economy “poor”: Arnold 31 | Hochul 30 | Stefanik 28 (3‑way) — transparency + concrete fixes resonate



    Questionnaire (12 items, neutral wording)
    1. Reg voter screen (self‑reported)
    2. Party ID & 2022 vote recall
    3. Fav/Unfav: Hochul, Stefanik, Jason S. Arnold
    4. Most important issue (open)
    5. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Stefanik
    6. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Jason S. Arnold
    7. 3‑way ballot: Hochul / Stefanik / Jason S. Arnold / someone else / undecided
    8. Confidence in each candidate to improve cost of living (0–10 scale)
    9. Confidence to improve public safety (0–10)
    10. Message test A (full transparency/Day‑One orders) — more/less likely/ no diff
    11. Message test B (Coney Island 2.0 jobs/tourism plan) — more/less likely/ no diff
    12. Demographics: age, gender, education, region, race/ethnicity, HH income
    New York State Gubernatorial — Mock Poll (Illustrative) Field dates (mock): Aug 10–13, 2025 Sample: 1,000 registered voters (RV), mixed phone/SMS-to-web Weighting: Region, gender, age, party ID, race/ethnicity, education, 2022 vote recall MOE: ±3.1% (RV) Turnout model: 2022 general baseline with modest GOP improvement in suburbs Topline — 3‑Way Ballot (RV) • Kathy Hochul (D) — 46% • Elise Stefanik (R) — 32% • Jason S. Arnold (I/Other) — 9% • Someone else — 3% • Undecided — 10% Read: Mirrors typical D advantage statewide, Stefanik trails by low‑ to mid‑teens; Arnold shows early viability as the only candidate running a fully transparent plan. Head‑to‑Head Scenarios (RV) Hochul vs. Stefanik • Hochul 48% • Stefanik 35% • Undecided 17% Hochul vs. Jason S. Arnold • Hochul 44% • Arnold 38% • Undecided 18% Read: Arnold consolidates more independents and soft Democrats than Stefanik can, cutting the margin to single digits. Region (3‑Way Ballot) • NYC (approx. 31% of sample): Hochul 67 | Stefanik 15 | Arnold 6 | Und 9 • Downstate Suburbs (LI/Westchester/Rockland, 28%): Hochul 44 | Stefanik 36 | Arnold 11 | Und 7 • Upstate (41%): Stefanik 44 | Hochul 33 | Arnold 11 | Und 9 Read: Arnold’s 10–11% in suburbs & upstate is a credible early lane; growth path is independents + moderate Republicans + anti‑status‑quo Dems. Party & Independents (3‑Way Ballot) • Democrats: Hochul 77 | Arnold 8 | Stefanik 7 | Und 6 • Republicans: Stefanik 70 | Arnold 13 | Hochul 10 | Und 6 • Independents: Arnold 28 | Hochul 34 | Stefanik 24 | Und 12 Read: Arnold leads or competes for plurality among independents, the key to statewide viability. Favorability (Fav/Unfav/Don’t know) • Hochul: 45 / 49 / 6 • Stefanik: 33 / 52 / 15 • Jason S. Arnold: 24 / 16 / 60 Read: Arnold’s low negatives + high unknowns = big upside with name‑ID growth. Top Issues (open-coded → grouped) • Cost of living/inflation: 34% • Crime/public safety: 18% • Housing/affordability: 15% • Taxes: 12% • Migration/services capacity: 9% • Transit/infrastructure: 6% • Other: 6% Issue Ownership (net trust) • Cost of living: Arnold +3 vs Hochul, Arnold +9 vs Stefanik • Crime: Arnold +5 vs Hochul, Stefanik +2 vs Hochul • Housing: Arnold +4 vs Hochul, Arnold +7 vs Stefanik Read: The “full‑plan transparency” message gives Arnold an issues credibility edge—especially on daily-life economics & housing. Message Tests (net more likely – less likely) • “Full transparency: every policy & Day‑One orders published now.” +23 • “Coney Island 2.0: tourism/jobs engine (Vegas+AC without the rot).” +14 (Downstate suburbs +19) • “Whistleblower/transparency on waste, fraud, and no‑show work.” +18 • “Education SEZ/LEZ: local control, measurable outcomes.” +12 • “Mental Health First Act & first‑responder supports.” +11 ⸻ Crosstab Highlights (selected) • Women (RV): Hochul +17 vs Stefanik; Hochul +6 vs Arnold • Men (RV): Hochul +4 vs Stefanik; Arnold +2 vs Hochul (independents drive this) • Hispanic voters: Hochul +25 vs Stefanik; Hochul +11 vs Arnold (Arnold competitive on cost-of-living frame) • Black voters: Hochul dominant; Arnold overperforms Stefanik on favorables by ~6 pts (low name ID = room to grow) • White non‑college: Stefanik leads Hochul by 6; Arnold within 4 of Stefanik with “work, wages, housing” message • Voters rating economy “poor”: Arnold 31 | Hochul 30 | Stefanik 28 (3‑way) — transparency + concrete fixes resonate ⸻ Questionnaire (12 items, neutral wording) 1. Reg voter screen (self‑reported) 2. Party ID & 2022 vote recall 3. Fav/Unfav: Hochul, Stefanik, Jason S. Arnold 4. Most important issue (open) 5. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Stefanik 6. Head‑to‑head: Hochul vs Jason S. Arnold 7. 3‑way ballot: Hochul / Stefanik / Jason S. Arnold / someone else / undecided 8. Confidence in each candidate to improve cost of living (0–10 scale) 9. Confidence to improve public safety (0–10) 10. Message test A (full transparency/Day‑One orders) — more/less likely/ no diff 11. Message test B (Coney Island 2.0 jobs/tourism plan) — more/less likely/ no diff 12. Demographics: age, gender, education, region, race/ethnicity, HH income
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 4كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة


  • Did We Actually Hit Fordow? A Mountain of Questions Remain

    June 29, 2025 | BETTR Defense Watch
    Contact: (516) 586-0660 | BETTR.community
    “I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.”



    The Headlines Say We Struck Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Site.

    But what really happened?

    According to DOD reports, the U.S. dropped 14 GBU-57A/B “bunker-busters” on Fordow and other Iranian nuclear sites. These bombs are enormous—each weighing 30,000 lbs with an explosive payload of 2.65 tons of TNT.

    That’s 37 total tons of explosive force dropped on one of the most secure nuclear facilities on Earth.

    Sounds huge… right?



    Let’s Put That In Perspective:

    Project
    TNT/Explosive Used
    Purpose

    Mount Rushmore
    ~450,000 tons (dynamite)
    To carve 4 faces into granite

    Hoover Dam
    ~4,250 tons (dynamite)
    To clear tunnels & foundations

    Fordow Strike
    37 tons (MOP bombs)
    To disable underground nuke site

    That means we used:
    ▸ 1/115th of what was used on Hoover Dam
    ▸ 1/12,000th of what was used to carve Mount Rushmore



    So What Did We Actually Hit?

    Satellite images confirm some surface damage and collapsed tunnel entrances
    Iran has begun repairing key shafts and backfilling blast zones
    No confirmation that underground centrifuge halls were destroyed
    U.S. intel sources admit it may have only set the nuclear program back by “months—not years”



    Reality Check: This Was a Message, Not a Mountain-Mover

    Fordow is buried under 250+ feet of reinforced rock and concrete.
    The bunker-busters dropped were tactical, not transformational.
    They likely disrupted access, not dismantled the program.

    This wasn’t Hiroshima. It wasn’t even Hoover Dam.
    It was a controlled hit on a hardened facility designed to withstand exactly this.



    Our Take:

    Strategic warning shot? Yes.
    Mission accomplished? Not even close.

    If this administration thinks that dropping a few dozen bunker busters is a serious long-term strategy to stop Iran’s nuclear push, they’re playing politics—not defense.



    Stay Informed. Get BETTR.

    (516) 586-0660
    BETTR.community
    #FordowFacts #MountainMath #BETTRDefense

    “I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.”
    — Jay Arnold, 2026 NY Gubernatorial Candidate
    💣 Did We Actually Hit Fordow? A Mountain of Questions Remain 📅 June 29, 2025 | 🔎 BETTR Defense Watch 📞 Contact: (516) 586-0660 | 🌐 BETTR.community 📣 “I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.” ⸻ 🛑 The Headlines Say We Struck Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Site. But what really happened? According to DOD reports, the U.S. dropped 14 GBU-57A/B “bunker-busters” on Fordow and other Iranian nuclear sites. These bombs are enormous—each weighing 30,000 lbs with an explosive payload of 2.65 tons of TNT. That’s 37 total tons of explosive force dropped on one of the most secure nuclear facilities on Earth. Sounds huge… right? ⸻ 🧱 Let’s Put That In Perspective: Project TNT/Explosive Used Purpose Mount Rushmore ~450,000 tons (dynamite) To carve 4 faces into granite Hoover Dam ~4,250 tons (dynamite) To clear tunnels & foundations Fordow Strike 37 tons (MOP bombs) To disable underground nuke site 📊 That means we used: ▸ 1/115th of what was used on Hoover Dam ▸ 1/12,000th of what was used to carve Mount Rushmore ⸻ 🕳️ So What Did We Actually Hit? ✔️ Satellite images confirm some surface damage and collapsed tunnel entrances ✔️ Iran has begun repairing key shafts and backfilling blast zones ❌ No confirmation that underground centrifuge halls were destroyed ❗ U.S. intel sources admit it may have only set the nuclear program back by “months—not years” ⸻ 🚨 Reality Check: This Was a Message, Not a Mountain-Mover Fordow is buried under 250+ feet of reinforced rock and concrete. The bunker-busters dropped were tactical, not transformational. They likely disrupted access, not dismantled the program. This wasn’t Hiroshima. It wasn’t even Hoover Dam. It was a controlled hit on a hardened facility designed to withstand exactly this. ⸻ 🎯 Our Take: ✔️ Strategic warning shot? Yes. ❌ Mission accomplished? Not even close. If this administration thinks that dropping a few dozen bunker busters is a serious long-term strategy to stop Iran’s nuclear push, they’re playing politics—not defense. ⸻ 🔔 Stay Informed. Get BETTR. 📞 (516) 586-0660 🌐 BETTR.community 🗳️ #FordowFacts #MountainMath #BETTRDefense “I’m not a good candidate, I’m the right one.” — Jay Arnold, 2026 NY Gubernatorial Candidate
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 2كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • How Zelensky’s Men Crippled Putin’s ‘Irreplaceable’ Bomber Fleet
    Operation Spiderweb just changed the game.
    In what many are calling Ukraine’s Pearl Harbor moment, a covert drone strike campaign orchestrated by Ukrainian intelligence obliterated over 34% of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet—deep inside Russian territory.

    The Plan:

    18-month operation

    Drones smuggled in shipping crates

    Remote launches from hidden trucks

    Targets: 5 airbases housing Russia’s elite Tu-95, Tu-22M, and A-50 bombers

    The Outcome:

    41 aircraft destroyed

    Massive blow to Russia’s long-range strike power

    $7 billion in estimated losses

    Putin’s nuclear deterrence strategy shaken to its core

    Ukraine’s strike proves one thing:
    This isn’t a war of attrition anymore—it’s a war of innovation, reach, and resolve. Zelensky’s team just outmaneuvered the Kremlin with brains, not just brawn.

    #Ukraine #Putin #Zelensky #DroneWarfare #StrategicBombers #Tu95 #OperationSpiderweb #MAGA #BETTRNews #NATO #GlobalSecurity
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14770641/How-Zelenskys-men-plotted-Op-Spiders-Web-blew-7bn-hole-Putins-irreplaceable-nuke-bomber-fleet-Experts-praise-genius-attack-warn-violent-response-humiliated-Kremlin.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwKqjxpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHm6gk5CRuf3V8y2_CyCLOHgrcQLOrAUbzchPNRxdvVIKqcwwMxQIJi5CD-av_aem_vxndvl0T7_qlw9gxMkLOMw
    💥 How Zelensky’s Men Crippled Putin’s ‘Irreplaceable’ Bomber Fleet Operation Spiderweb just changed the game. In what many are calling Ukraine’s Pearl Harbor moment, a covert drone strike campaign orchestrated by Ukrainian intelligence obliterated over 34% of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet—deep inside Russian territory. 🕸️ The Plan: 18-month operation Drones smuggled in shipping crates Remote launches from hidden trucks Targets: 5 airbases housing Russia’s elite Tu-95, Tu-22M, and A-50 bombers 🛑 The Outcome: 41 aircraft destroyed Massive blow to Russia’s long-range strike power $7 billion in estimated losses Putin’s nuclear deterrence strategy shaken to its core 🇺🇦 Ukraine’s strike proves one thing: This isn’t a war of attrition anymore—it’s a war of innovation, reach, and resolve. Zelensky’s team just outmaneuvered the Kremlin with brains, not just brawn. #Ukraine #Putin #Zelensky #DroneWarfare #StrategicBombers #Tu95 #OperationSpiderweb #MAGA #BETTRNews #NATO #GlobalSecurity https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14770641/How-Zelenskys-men-plotted-Op-Spiders-Web-blew-7bn-hole-Putins-irreplaceable-nuke-bomber-fleet-Experts-praise-genius-attack-warn-violent-response-humiliated-Kremlin.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwKqjxpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHm6gk5CRuf3V8y2_CyCLOHgrcQLOrAUbzchPNRxdvVIKqcwwMxQIJi5CD-av_aem_vxndvl0T7_qlw9gxMkLOMw
    WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK
    How Zelensky's men plot blew up Putin's 'irreplaceable' bomber fleet
    It was a top-secret operation some 18 months in the planning. 'Spider's Web' was executed with devastating effect yesterday afternoon and was as audacious as it was genius.
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 3كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
  • Trump Warns: “Putin Is Playing With Fire”
    Former President Trump issued a stark warning, saying Vladimir Putin is ‘playing with fire’ amid rising global tensions.
    Diplomacy is fading—brinkmanship is back.

    Is this a preview of 2026 foreign policy debates—or a message to Biden, too?

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2025/05/27/trump-says-putin-playing-with-fire-as-he-ratchets-up-attacks-on-russian-leader/?utm_campaign=socialflowForbesMainFB&utm_source=ForbesMainFacebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4nwdyUbegc8Iop0r8Ku_TQz_2jgSj-M3jFpWE5TmhKMTrgpZjI-JP__PF6iA_aem_d6FpOV4ZM5XkOURyAixkvQ

    #Trump #Putin #Geopolitics #Russia #NATO #MAGA2026 #jsa2026 #BETTR #ForeignPolicy #GlobalStandoff


    🔥 Trump Warns: “Putin Is Playing With Fire” Former President Trump issued a stark warning, saying Vladimir Putin is ‘playing with fire’ amid rising global tensions. Diplomacy is fading—brinkmanship is back. Is this a preview of 2026 foreign policy debates—or a message to Biden, too? 🔗https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2025/05/27/trump-says-putin-playing-with-fire-as-he-ratchets-up-attacks-on-russian-leader/?utm_campaign=socialflowForbesMainFB&utm_source=ForbesMainFacebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4nwdyUbegc8Iop0r8Ku_TQz_2jgSj-M3jFpWE5TmhKMTrgpZjI-JP__PF6iA_aem_d6FpOV4ZM5XkOURyAixkvQ #Trump #Putin #Geopolitics #Russia #NATO #MAGA2026 #jsa2026 #BETTR #ForeignPolicy #GlobalStandoff
    WWW.FORBES.COM
    Trump Says Putin Is ‘Playing With Fire’
    President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post Tuesday morning that if it weren’t for him, “lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia.”
    0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 2كيلو بايت مشاهدة 0 معاينة
الصفحات المعززة